Here’s a detailed framework for a sample testing session using blind samples in an Oud Quality Assessment Course:
1. Objective
- Train participants to identify authentic vs. synthetic or adulterated Oud using chemical data.
- Develop skills in chromatogram interpretation, peak assignment, and comparative analysis.
- Promote critical thinking, accuracy, and reproducibility in lab assessments.
2. Preparation of Blind Samples
| Step | Details |
|---|---|
| Sample Selection | Include a variety of samples: high-grade authentic, low-grade, diluted, and synthetic-mimicked oils or chips |
| Coding / Blinding | Assign a random alphanumeric code to each sample (e.g., B-01, B-02, etc.) |
| Data Generation | Acquire GC-MS or FTIR spectra for each sample in advance or provide pre-recorded chromatograms/spectra |
| Distribution | Ensure participants cannot identify samples by appearance or scent during the initial chemical analysis |
3. Analytical Task for Participants
- GC-MS Analysis (for volatile compounds)
- Identify major sesquiterpene peaks: α-Guaiene, δ-Guaiene, Agarospirol, etc.
- Compare peak ratios to reference data.
- Detect synthetic markers: guaiacol, isoeugenol, vanillin.
- Note any solvent residues or unusual peaks.
- FTIR Analysis (for functional group fingerprinting)
- Identify characteristic O-H, C=O, C=C, and CH2/CH3 stretches.
- Detect abnormal peaks indicative of adulteration.
- Compare spectra to reference authentic Oud spectra.
- Comparative Analysis
- Match blind samples against reference profiles.
- Classify as: Genuine, Low-grade, Synthetic, or Adulterated.
- Record confidence level in identification.
4. Evaluation Metrics
| Criterion | Scoring / Weight |
|---|---|
| Accuracy of Peak Identification | 25% |
| Detection of Adulteration / Anomalies | 25% |
| Comparative Analysis / Classification | 25% |
| Report Clarity & Justification | 25% |
Optional: Include time efficiency and peer discussion contribution as bonus points.
5. Reporting Format for Participants
Sample Analysis Table:
| Sample Code | Identified Sesquiterpenes | Chromones Detected | Synthetic / Adulteration Indicators | Classification | Confidence Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-01 | α-Guaiene, δ-Guaiene, Agarospirol | THPEC, EPEC | None | Genuine | High | Matches ISO 4730 reference |
| B-02 | α-Guaiene | Low chromones | Guaiacol detected | Adulterated | Medium | Suspected synthetic addition |
6. Debriefing / Discussion
- Compare participant classifications with the actual sample identity.
- Discuss common errors, e.g., misidentifying peaks or missing minor chromones.
- Highlight chemical-sensory correlation, if aroma notes are also evaluated.
- Provide guidance on interpreting complex chromatograms and spectra.
7. Learning Outcomes
By the end of the session, participants will be able to:
- Correctly read and interpret GC-MS chromatograms and FTIR spectra.
- Detect adulteration or dilution in blind Oud samples.
- Apply ISO 4730 chemical benchmarks for authenticity verification.
- Prepare structured analytical reports for quality assessment.
